99

 

inform them ot the terms of the contract

but to inform them ot the terms of the contract. Hay man v. Ncalc, 2 Camp. 337. The authority, however, reebok easy tone of the broker may be countermanded at any time before a memorandum of the contract of sale is written and signed by him, pursuant to the jimmy choo statute against frauds, although he has previously entered into a verbal agreement to sell the goods. Farmer v. Hobinson, 2 Camp. 339.
If goods reebok easytone in the City of London arc sold by a broker, to be paid by a bill of exchange, the vendor has a right, within a reasonable time, if lie is not satisfied with the sufficiency of the zigtech purchaser, to annul the contract. The vendor, however, must intimate his jimmy choo shoes dissent as soon as he has had an opportunity to enquire into http://www.ebuyv.com/  the solvency of the purchaser, and five days was considered too long a period for this purpose. Hodgson v. Davis, 2 Camp. 530.
When unlimited orders are given to factors, and they arc left reebok zig to sell or buy on the best conditions thev can, whatever detriment occurs to their constituents, they have their excuse in their hands, reebok zigtech as it is to be presumed they acted for the best, and were governed by the dictates of prudence.
A factor is barely a trustee for his principal; therefore, if this latter, having goods in the other's hands, owes him money by simple contract, and then dies indebted by specialty, more than his assets arc worth, the factor cannot retain the goods.
But sec G Fast. 28. Ambl. 252. 3 Bo?, and Pal. 488. 490.
If a factor receives only a bare commission to sell and dispose, it will not enable him to trust; for,, in the due execution of his authority, he ought on a sale to receive quid pro quo and, on the delivery of the one, to receive the other; for, otherwise, by that manolo blahnik shoes means, as they may trust six months, they may trust sixteen vcars, not by virtue of manolo blahnik any clause m their orders that leaves them at liberty to act as tficy think best, or of doing as if the affair reebok was their own, may tlicy trust an unreasonable time, as ten or twenty years, instead of one, two, or three months, supposing this the accustomaiy time of crcdit for the like commodities: and so it was adjudged, where one had remitted jewels to his factor in Barbary, who disposed of the same to Mulleshack the Emperor, for a sum ccrtain, to be paid' at a time, which being elapsed, the factor not obtaining it, was forced to make the same good to his principal.
It is now held, that a factor may sell on crcdit, unless the usage of the trade be to the contrary. Willcs Ilcp. 406. 3 Bos. and Pul. 489. 1 Camp. 259. Sclw. Ni. Pri. 2 Ed. 829.
A factor, as such, has not any authority to pledge, but only to sell the goods of his principal. Paterson v. Tash, Str. 1178. pr. Lee, Cli. J. Hence, if the factor pledge the goods of his principal, the latter may recover the value of them in an action of trover against the pawner, on tendering to the skechers shape ups factor what is due to him, without